↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of qPCR, Sanger Sequencing, and Whole-Genome Sequencing in Determining Clarithromycin and Levofloxacin Resistance in Helicobacter pylori

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of the Diagnostic Performance of qPCR, Sanger Sequencing, and Whole-Genome Sequencing in Determining Clarithromycin and Levofloxacin Resistance in Helicobacter pylori
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2020.596371
Pubmed ID
Authors

Konrad Egli, Karoline Wagner, Peter M Keller, Lorenz Risch, Martin Risch, Thomas Bodmer

Abstract

Helicobacter pylori antibiotic resistance is increasing worldwide, emphasizing the urgent need for more rapid resistance detection prior to the administration of H. pylori eradication regimens. Macrolides and fluoroquinolones are widely used to treat H. pylori. In this study, we aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of A) 23SrDNA qPCR (with melting curve analysis) and an in-house developed gyrA qPCR followed by Sanger sequencing with a commercial IVD-marked hybridization probe assay (for 23SrDNA and gyrA) using 142 gastric biopsies (skipping culturing) and B) the same two qPCR for 23SrDNA and gyrA (including Sanger sequencing) with whole-genome sequencing (WGS) and phenotypic characterization of clarithromycin and levofloxacin resistance using 76 cultured isolates. The sensitivity of both qPCRs was 100% compared to that of the commercial IVD-marked hybridization probe assay for the detection of H. pylori in gastric biopsies (without resistance testing). The specificity of the qPCR gyrA followed by Sanger sequencing was 100%, indicating that the best sequence identity was always H. pylori. The results show good agreement between molecular tests, especially between qPCR (inclusive Sanger sequencing) and WGS. Discrepancies (concerning mutated or wild type of positive H. pylori gastric biopsies) were observed between Sanger sequencing of the gyrA gene and the corresponding commercial hybridization probe assay, mostly because the high sequence diversity of the gyrA gene even at positions adjacent to the relevant codons of 87 and 91 interfered with obtaining correct results from the hybridization probe assay. Interestingly, we found several mixed sequences, indicating mixed populations in the gastric biopsies (direct detection without culturing). There was a high percentage of both levofloxacin and clarithromycin resistance in gastric biopsies (both between 22% and 29%, direct detection in gastric biopsies). Therefore, we recommend analyzing both targets in parallel. We confirmed that phenotypic resistance is highly correlated with the associated mutations. We concluded that the two qPCR followed by Sanger sequencing of the gyrA gene is a fast, cost-effective and comprehensive method for resistance testing of H. pylori directly in gastric biopsies.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 22%
Unspecified 2 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 18 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 4 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 11%
Unspecified 2 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 20 56%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2021.
All research outputs
#18,777,896
of 23,269,984 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#5,037
of 6,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#353,671
of 475,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#175
of 241 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,269,984 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 475,121 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 241 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.