↓ Skip to main content

Optimising Treatment Outcomes for Children and Adults Through Rapid Genome Sequencing of Sepsis Pathogens. A Study Protocol for a Prospective, Multi-Centre Trial (DIRECT)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Optimising Treatment Outcomes for Children and Adults Through Rapid Genome Sequencing of Sepsis Pathogens. A Study Protocol for a Prospective, Multi-Centre Trial (DIRECT)
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, June 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2021.667680
Pubmed ID
Authors

Adam D. Irwin, Lachlan J. M. Coin, Patrick N. A. Harris, Menino Osbert Cotta, Michelle J. Bauer, Cameron Buckley, Ross Balch, Peter Kruger, Jason Meyer, Kiran Shekar, Kara Brady, Cheryl Fourie, Natalie Sharp, Luminita Vlad, David Whiley, Scott A. Beatson, Brian M. Forde, David Paterson, Julia Clark, Krispin Hajkowicz, Sainath Raman, Seweryn Bialasiewicz, Jeffrey Lipman, Luregn J. Schlapbach, Jason A. Roberts

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 17%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 19 54%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 20 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2023.
All research outputs
#2,459,175
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#431
of 8,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,092
of 455,107 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#24
of 311 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,107 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 311 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.