The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Comparative proteomics analysis of Schistosoma japonicum developed in different Oncomelania snails as intermediate hosts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2022.1100710 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gongzhen Liu, Feng Miao, Yongbin Wang, Jingxuan Kou, Kun Yang, Wei Li, Chunrong Xiong, Fengjian Zhang, Xinyao Wang, Haoyun Yan, Changyin Wei, Changlei Zhao, Ge Yan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#20,875,908
of 23,495,502 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#6,381
of 6,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#350,130
of 441,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#428
of 431 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,495,502 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,823 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 431 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.