The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nasopharyngeal Bacterial Microbiota Composition and SARS-CoV-2 IgG Antibody Maintenance in Asymptomatic/Paucisymptomatic Subjects
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2022.882302 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Luca Ferrari, Chiara Favero, Giulia Solazzo, Jacopo Mariani, Anna Luganini, Monica Ferraroni, Emanuele Montomoli, Gregorio Paolo Milani, Valentina Bollati, UNICORN Consortium, Benedetta Albetti, Claudio Bandi, Tommaso Bellini, Valentina Bollati, Matteo Bonzini, Marco Buscaglia, Carlo Cantarella, Laura Cantone, Michele Carugno, Sergio Casartelli, Sarah D’Alessandro, Francesca De Chiara, Serena Delbue, Ivano Eberini, Chiara Favero, Luca Ferrari, Monica Ferraroni, Laura Galastri, Cristina Galli, Simona Iodice, Carlo La Vecchia, Chiara Macchi, Alessandro Manenti, Ilaria Manini, Jacopo Mariani, Serena Marchi, Gregorio Paolo Milani, Emanuele Montomoli, Elena Pariani, Federica Rota, Angela Cecilia Pesatori, Massimiliano Ruscica, Tommaso Schioppo, Letizia Tarantini, Claudia Maria Trombetta, Marco Vicenzi, Giuliano Zanchetta |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Comoros | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 24% |
| Researcher | 3 | 18% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 18% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 12% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 12% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 18% |
| Unknown | 4 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2022.
All research outputs
#20,717,791
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#6,047
of 8,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#326,826
of 438,097 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#467
of 600 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,097 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 600 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.