↓ Skip to main content

Variability in Susceptibility to Type I Interferon Response and Subgenomic RNA Accumulation Between Clinical Isolates of Dengue and Zika Virus From Oaxaca Mexico Correlate With Replication Efficiency…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Variability in Susceptibility to Type I Interferon Response and Subgenomic RNA Accumulation Between Clinical Isolates of Dengue and Zika Virus From Oaxaca Mexico Correlate With Replication Efficiency in Human Cells and Disease Severity
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2022.890750
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tannya Karen Castro-Jiménez, Laura Cristina Gómez-Legorreta, Laura Alejandra López-Campa, Valeria Martínez-Torres, Marcos Alvarado-Silva, Araceli Posadas-Mondragón, Nallely Díaz-Lima, Hilda Arcelia Angulo-Mendez, Nancy R. Mejía-Domínguez, Felipe Vaca-Paniagua, Federico Ávila-Moreno, Julio García-Cordero, Leticia Cedillo-Barrón, Sergio Roberto Aguilar-Ruíz, José Bustos-Arriaga

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 27%
Student > Bachelor 6 27%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 27%
Immunology and Microbiology 5 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 6 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2022.
All research outputs
#13,553,123
of 24,040,389 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#1,951
of 7,246 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#166,173
of 429,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#141
of 592 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,040,389 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,246 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,626 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 592 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.