↓ Skip to main content

Comparison Analysis of Different DNA Extraction Methods on Suitability for Long-Read Metagenomic Nanopore Sequencing

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison Analysis of Different DNA Extraction Methods on Suitability for Long-Read Metagenomic Nanopore Sequencing
Published in
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fcimb.2022.919903
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lei Zhang, Ting Chen, Ye Wang, Shengwei Zhang, Qingyu Lv, Decong Kong, Hua Jiang, Yuling Zheng, Yuhao Ren, Wenhua Huang, Peng Liu, Yongqiang Jiang

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 35 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 14%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 18 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 18 51%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 July 2022.
All research outputs
#3,181,131
of 26,393,142 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#618
of 8,417 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,614
of 447,062 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#38
of 600 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,393,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,417 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,062 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 600 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.