The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Isolation and identification of Tete virus group (Peribunyaviridae: Orthobunyavirus) from Culicoides biting midges collected in Lichuan County, China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2023.1193184 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qikai Yin, Rui Cheng, Xiuyan Xu, Ziqian Xu, Jing Wang, Shihong Fu, Hongbin Xu, Shaozai Zhang, Ying He, Fan Li, Songtao Xu, Xiaoqing Lu, Huanyu Wang, Bin Wang, Guodong Liang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2023.
All research outputs
#14,964,950
of 25,443,857 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#2,566
of 8,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#144,029
of 358,777 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#53
of 327 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,443,857 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,110 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 358,777 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 327 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.