The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Exploring the gut microbiota’s effect on temporomandibular joint disorder: a two−sample Mendelian randomization analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, August 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1361373 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kai Zhao, Shuaiqi Ji, Han Jiang, Yunzhu Qian, Weibing Zhang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2024.
All research outputs
#23,764,272
of 26,452,360 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#6,644
of 8,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#101,794
of 132,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#49
of 81 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,452,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 132,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 81 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.