The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Akkermansia muciniphila and Parabacteroides distasonis as prognostic markers for relapse in ulcerative colitis patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1367998 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana Mendes-Frias, Marta Moreira, Maria C. Vieira, Joana Gaifem, Patrício Costa, Luís Lopes, Ricardo Silvestre |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 50% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2024.
All research outputs
#6,927,028
of 26,382,058 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#1,366
of 8,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,093
of 222,240 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#12
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,382,058 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,410 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,240 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.