The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Bacterial aggregation facilitates internalin-mediated invasion of Listeria monocytogenes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1411124 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liam Feltham, Josephine Moran, Marie Goldrick, Elizabeth Lord, David G. Spiller, Jennifer S. Cavet, Mark Muldoon, Ian. S. Roberts, Pawel Paszek |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2024.
All research outputs
#17,244,533
of 26,289,377 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#3,737
of 8,370 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,882
of 144,566 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
#13
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,289,377 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,370 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,566 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.