The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Communication Structures and Decision Making Cues and Criteria to Support Effective Drought Warning in Central Malawi
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Climate, November 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fclim.2020.578327 |
| Authors |
Alexia Calvel, Micha Werner, Marc van den Homberg, Andrés Cabrera Flamini, Ileen Streefkerk, Neha Mittal, Stephen Whitfield, Charles Langton Vanya, Clement Boyce |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Malawi | 1 | 50% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 46 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 7% |
| Researcher | 3 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 11% |
| Unknown | 29 | 63% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 4 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 9% |
| Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2020.
All research outputs
#14,033,993
of 23,267,128 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Climate
#235
of 346 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#254,297
of 508,818 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Climate
#16
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,267,128 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 346 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 508,818 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.