The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Boundary Work and Interpretations in the IPCC Review Process of the Role of Bioenergy With Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS) in Limiting Global Warming to 1.5°C
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Climate, April 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fclim.2021.643224 |
| Authors |
Anders Hansson, Jonas Anshelm, Mathias Fridahl, Simon Haikola |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 70% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 56 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 25 | 45% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 6 | 11% |
| Engineering | 6 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 9% |
| Chemical Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 28 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2024.
All research outputs
#4,368,364
of 26,533,029 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Climate
#256
of 540 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#98,685
of 459,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Climate
#11
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,533,029 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 540 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,833 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.