The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Toward a transformative climate change adaptation from local to global perspective—A transdisciplinary challenge by Kyoto Climate Change Adaptation Center
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Climate, February 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fclim.2023.1304989 |
Authors |
Masako Ichihara, Yoshinori Nakagawa, Reiichiro Ishii, Tatsuyoshi Saijo, Tetsuzo Yasunari |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Lecturer | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2024.
All research outputs
#3,774,283
of 25,332,933 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Climate
#173
of 452 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,610
of 165,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Climate
#7
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,332,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 452 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.