You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Editorial: Decision making for the net zero transformation: considerations and new methodological approaches
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Climate, January 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fclim.2024.1355110 |
Authors |
Mark Workman, Adrian Gault, Katy Roelich, Geoff Darch, Gireesh Shrimali |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#3,754,827
of 25,231,854 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Climate
#172
of 445 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,651
of 155,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Climate
#8
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,231,854 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 445 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 155,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.