↓ Skip to main content

Neural evidence of deprioritizing to-be-forgotten information in visual working memory

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cognition, July 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Neural evidence of deprioritizing to-be-forgotten information in visual working memory
Published in
Frontiers in Cognition, July 2024
DOI 10.3389/fcogn.2024.1404909
Authors

Katherine C. Moen, Melissa R. Beck, Scarlett Horner, Steven G. Greening

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2024.
All research outputs
#15,458,449
of 26,399,279 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cognition
#13
of 37 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,619
of 138,849 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cognition
#2
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,399,279 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 37 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.3. This one scored the same or higher as 24 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 138,849 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.