↓ Skip to main content

Good continuation in 3D: the neurogeometry of stereo vision

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Computer Science, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Good continuation in 3D: the neurogeometry of stereo vision
Published in
Frontiers in Computer Science, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fcomp.2023.1142621
Pubmed ID
Authors

Maria Virginia Bolelli, Giovanna Citti, Alessandro Sarti, Steven W. Zucker

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2024.
All research outputs
#20,871,964
of 26,515,106 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Computer Science
#241
of 590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,510
of 385,364 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Computer Science
#8
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,515,106 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 590 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 385,364 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.