↓ Skip to main content

Poaching Threatens the Establishment of a Lynx Population, Highlighting the Need for a Centralized Judiciary Approach

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Conservation Science, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#22 of 347)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
10 news outlets
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Poaching Threatens the Establishment of a Lynx Population, Highlighting the Need for a Centralized Judiciary Approach
Published in
Frontiers in Conservation Science, June 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcosc.2021.665000
Authors

Raphaël Arlettaz, Guillaume Chapron, Marc Kéry, Elisabeth Klaus, Stéphane Mettaz, Stefanie Roder, Sergio Vignali, Fridolin Zimmermann, Veronika Braunisch

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 15%
Other 4 12%
Researcher 4 12%
Unspecified 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 12 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 35%
Environmental Science 7 21%
Unspecified 3 9%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 March 2023.
All research outputs
#488,507
of 24,406,441 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#22
of 347 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,592
of 436,348 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#6
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,406,441 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 347 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,348 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.