You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Commentary: Underestimating the Challenges of Avoiding a Ghastly Future
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, May 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2021.666910 |
| Authors |
Jevgeniy Bluwstein, Adeniyi P. Asiyanbi, Anwesha Dutta, Amber Huff, Jens Friis Lund, Salvatore Paolo De Rosa, Julia Steinberger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 657 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 65 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 38 | 6% |
| Australia | 12 | 2% |
| Canada | 12 | 2% |
| Sweden | 5 | <1% |
| India | 5 | <1% |
| Curaçao | 5 | <1% |
| Norway | 4 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Other | 62 | 9% |
| Unknown | 445 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 570 | 87% |
| Scientists | 55 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 18 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 12 | 2% |
| Unknown | 2 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 29 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 7 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 24% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 14% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 14% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 7% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 441. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2024.
All research outputs
#66,783
of 26,203,160 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#5
of 428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,149
of 458,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,203,160 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 428 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 23.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 458,902 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.