The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Decision-Making for Rewilding: An Adaptive Governance Framework for Social-Ecological Complexity
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2021.681545 |
Authors |
James R. A. Butler, Mariella Marzano, Nathalie Pettorelli, Sarah M. Durant, Johan T. du Toit, Juliette C. Young |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Australia | 1 | 5% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
Philippines | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 16 | 84% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 58% |
Scientists | 8 | 42% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 67 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 67 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 9 | 13% |
Unspecified | 7 | 10% |
Student > Master | 7 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 9% |
Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
Other | 14 | 21% |
Unknown | 19 | 28% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Environmental Science | 13 | 19% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 16% |
Unspecified | 8 | 12% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 10% |
Arts and Humanities | 2 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 7% |
Unknown | 21 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2022.
All research outputs
#3,638,228
of 24,605,383 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#107
of 353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,789
of 437,197 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#18
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,605,383 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 32.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,197 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.