The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Local Awareness and Interpretations of Species Extinction in a Rural Chinese Biodiversity Hotspot
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2021.689561 |
| Authors |
Heidi Ma, Sarah K. Papworth, Tianbei Ge, Xiaohan Wu, Chuyue Yu, Hanxue Zhang, Samuel T. Turvey |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 25% |
| Germany | 1 | 4% |
| Congo, The Democratic Republic of the | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 19 | 68% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 17 | 61% |
| Scientists | 11 | 39% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 4 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Researcher | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 5 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 7 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 18% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 13 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,155,337
of 26,522,299 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#89
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#50,565
of 456,113 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#10
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,522,299 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,113 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.