The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Developing an Evidence-Based Coexistence Strategy to Promote Human and Wildlife Health in a Biodiverse Agroforest Landscape
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2021.735367 |
Authors |
Elena Bersacola, Hannah Parathian, Amélia Frazão-Moreira, Maimuna Jaló, Américo Sanhá, Aissa Regalla, Abílio Rachid Saíd, Queba Quecuta, Samba Tenem Camará, Sara Marunur Faria Fernandes Quade, Sidi Mohamed Jaquite, Aristoteles Gomes Lopes, Livia V. Patrono, Marina Ramon, Joana Bessa, Brendan J. Godley, Camille Bonneaud, Fabian H. Leendertz, Kimberley J. Hockings |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
Spain | 1 | 7% |
Portugal | 1 | 7% |
Uganda | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 33 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 12% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 9% |
Student > Master | 3 | 9% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Researcher | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 18 | 55% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 24% |
Environmental Science | 4 | 12% |
Unspecified | 2 | 6% |
Engineering | 2 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 16 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,342,428
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#95
of 298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,869
of 439,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#27
of 61 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 34.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,690 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 61 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.