↓ Skip to main content

Urbanization Negatively Affects the Species Composition of Native Ladybirds in Central Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Conservation Science, December 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Urbanization Negatively Affects the Species Composition of Native Ladybirds in Central Europe
Published in
Frontiers in Conservation Science, December 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcosc.2021.741899
Authors

Jiří Skuhrovec, Alois Honek, Zdenka Martinkova

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 20%
Researcher 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 20%
Environmental Science 1 10%
Unknown 4 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,327,399
of 23,570,677 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#239
of 309 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#266,464
of 511,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#40
of 52 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,570,677 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 309 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.8. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 511,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 52 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.