The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Community-Based Approaches to Tackling Illegal Wildlife Trade—What Works and How Is It Measured?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, October 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2021.765725 |
Authors |
Olivia Wilson-Holt, Dilys Roe |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 6 | 35% |
Indonesia | 1 | 6% |
South Africa | 1 | 6% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 8 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 15 | 88% |
Scientists | 2 | 12% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 4 | 14% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 3 | 11% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 11 | 39% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 18% |
Social Sciences | 3 | 11% |
Environmental Science | 3 | 11% |
Unspecified | 2 | 7% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 12 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#3,233,642
of 25,208,845 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#109
of 391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,973
of 435,358 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#24
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,208,845 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,358 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.