The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Hurdles to developing quantitative decision support for Endangered Species Act resource allocation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2022.1002804 |
| Authors |
Gwenllian D. Iacona, Stephanie Avery-Gomm, Richard F. Maloney, James Brazill-Boast, Deborah T. Crouse, C. Ashton Drew, Rebecca S. Epanchin-Niell, Sarah B. Hall, Lynn A. Maguire, Tim Male, Jeff Newman, Hugh P. Possingham, Libby Rumpff, Michael C. Runge, Katherine C. B. Weiss, Robyn S. Wilson, Marilet A. Zablan, Leah R. Gerber |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 20% |
| United States | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 60% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 40% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 20% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 20% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2023.
All research outputs
#13,230,338
of 23,415,749 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#181
of 301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,238
of 442,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#24
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,415,749 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.2. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,822 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.