The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
We are silently paving the way toward human–wildlife coexistence: The role of women in the rural landscapes of southern Andes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, November 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2022.1006006 |
| Authors |
Rocío Almuna, Josefina Cortés, María de los Ángeles Medina, Solange P. Vargas |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Argentina | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 5 | 83% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
| Scientists | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 28% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 19% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 19% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 11% |
| Unknown | 11 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2023.
All research outputs
#13,050,590
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#175
of 310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,754
of 453,420 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#15
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 35.7. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,420 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.