The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Leopards in the City: The Tale of Sanjay Gandhi National Park and Tungareshwar Wildlife Sanctuary, Two Protected Areas in and Adjacent to Mumbai, India
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, March 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2022.787031 |
Authors |
Nikit Sanjay Surve, Sambandam Sathyakumar, Kalyanasundaram Sankar, Devcharan Jathanna, Vikas Gupta, Vidya Athreya |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 6 | 33% |
United States | 1 | 6% |
Germany | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 10 | 56% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
Scientists | 6 | 33% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 21 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 4 | 19% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 14% |
Other | 2 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
Researcher | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 33% |
Environmental Science | 6 | 29% |
Unknown | 8 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 November 2023.
All research outputs
#2,856,374
of 26,374,136 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#105
of 435 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,586
of 453,861 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#12
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,374,136 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 435 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 22.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,861 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.