The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 29 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
An expanding cityscape and its multi-scale effects on lizard distribution
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, July 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2022.839836 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Maria Thaker, Madhura S. Amdekar, Nitya P. Mohanty, Abhijit K. Nageshkumar, Harish Prakash, K. S Seshadri |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 9 | 31% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 19 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 52% |
| Scientists | 13 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 15 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 27% |
| Professor | 1 | 7% |
| Researcher | 1 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 8 | 53% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 10 | 67% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 August 2022.
All research outputs
#1,431,165
of 26,525,003 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#61
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,087
of 440,140 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#6
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,525,003 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,140 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.