The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Restoration of Degraded Lands by Local Communities and Indigenous Peoples
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2022.873659 |
| Authors |
Nadia S. Santini, Yosune Miquelajauregui |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 4 | 17% |
| United States | 1 | 4% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 4% |
| Australia | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 16 | 70% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 65% |
| Scientists | 6 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 4% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 63 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 8 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 11% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 7 | 11% |
| Unknown | 30 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,148,612
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#82
of 411 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,477
of 447,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#4
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 411 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.