The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 77 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Social science for conservation in working landscapes and seascapes
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2022.954930 |
| Authors |
Nathan J. Bennett, Molly Dodge, Thomas S. Akre, Steven W. J. Canty, Rafael Chiaravalloti, Ashley A. Dayer, Jessica L. Deichmann, David Gill, Melanie McField, James McNamara, Shannon E. Murphy, A. Justin Nowakowski, Melissa Songer |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 14 | 18% |
| Canada | 4 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 4% |
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| Comoros | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 48 | 62% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 43 | 56% |
| Scientists | 28 | 36% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 6% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 59 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Professor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 10% |
| Unknown | 23 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 16 | 27% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 17% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Unknown | 23 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 48. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 December 2022.
All research outputs
#932,734
of 26,433,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#38
of 441 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,131
of 435,695 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#5
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,433,695 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 441 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,695 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.