The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Applying a gender lens to biodiversity conservation in High Asia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2023.1006052 |
| Authors |
Justine Shanti Alexander, Ranjini Murali, Tserennadmid Nadia Mijiddorj, Bayarjargal Agvaantseren, Chemi Lhamo, Deepshikha Sharma, Kulbhushansingh Ramesh Suryawanshi, Lu Zhi, Koustubh Sharma, Juliette Claire Young |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 75% |
| Scientists | 3 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 36% |
| Researcher | 1 | 9% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Lecturer > Senior Lecturer | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 27% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 18% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 9% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 9% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#4,244,451
of 25,939,391 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#129
of 413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,607
of 428,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,939,391 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 428,759 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.