The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mining expansion may reduce livestock but facilitate vicuñas recovery in tropical Puna of South America
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, July 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2024.1405392 |
| Authors |
Ana Patricia Sandoval-Calderon, Marijke van Kuijk, Yann Hautier, Humber Alberto, Pita A. Verweij |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2024.
All research outputs
#8,941,946
of 26,526,880 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#226
of 443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,905
of 230,572 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,526,880 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 66th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.4. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,572 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.