The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Consolidating diverse modeling methods and spatial prioritization for multispecies connectivity planning
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Conservation Science, July 2024
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcosc.2024.1406944 |
Authors |
Eve Bohnett, Jon Oetting, Reed Noss, Michael O’Brien, Robert Frakes, Dan Smith, Sarah Lockhart, Jennifer Mullinax, Erin E. Poor, Brian Scheick, Thomas Hoctor |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 5 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2024.
All research outputs
#15,360,174
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#248
of 444 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,362
of 233,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Conservation Science
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 444 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.3. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 233,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.