The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
| Title |
Key Strategies for Clinical Management and Improvement of Healthcare Services for Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Patients in the Coronavirus (COVID-19) Settings: Recommendations From the REPROGRAM Consortium
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, June 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2020.00112 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sonu Bhaskar, Aarushi Rastogi, Vijay Kumar Chattu, Anil Adisesh, Pravin Thomas, Negman Alvarado, Anis D. Riahi, Chakrakodi N. Varun, Anupama R. Pai, Sarah Barsam, Antony H. Walker |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Canada | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 251 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 27 | 11% |
| Researcher | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Librarian | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 53 | 21% |
| Unknown | 99 | 39% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 58 | 23% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 2% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 105 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2022.
All research outputs
#16,375,494
of 26,289,377 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2,338
of 9,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,913
of 424,731 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#30
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,289,377 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,478 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,731 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.