↓ Skip to main content

Chronic Stress-Related Neural Activity Associates With Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease in a Community-Based Cohort: Data From the Washington, D.C. Cardiovascular Health and Needs Assessment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, March 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Chronic Stress-Related Neural Activity Associates With Subclinical Cardiovascular Disease in a Community-Based Cohort: Data From the Washington, D.C. Cardiovascular Health and Needs Assessment
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, March 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2021.599341
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tiffany M. Powell-Wiley, Amit K. Dey, Joshua P. Rivers, Abhishek Chaturvedi, Marcus R. Andrews, Joniqua N. Ceasar, Sophie E. Claudel, Valerie M. Mitchell, Colby Ayers, Kosuke Tamura, Cristhian A. Gutierrez-Huerta, Heather L. Teague, Steffen G. Oeser, Aditya Goyal, Aditya A. Joshi, Billy S. Collins, Yvonne Baumer, Stephanie T. Chung, Anne E. Sumner, Martin P. Playford, Ahmed Tawakol, Nehal N. Mehta

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Lecturer 2 6%
Other 1 3%
Student > Master 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 21 66%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 6%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Psychology 1 3%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 19 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 April 2021.
All research outputs
#2,548,863
of 25,292,646 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#335
of 9,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,719
of 429,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#14
of 289 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,292,646 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,102 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 289 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.