↓ Skip to main content

Studying the Endothelial Glycocalyx in vitro: What Is Missing?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, April 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
60 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Studying the Endothelial Glycocalyx in vitro: What Is Missing?
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, April 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2021.647086
Pubmed ID
Authors

Andrew B. Haymet, Nicole Bartnikowski, Emily S. Wood, Michael P. Vallely, Angela McBride, Sophie Yacoub, Scott B. Biering, Eva Harris, Jacky Y. Suen, John F. Fraser

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 60 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Researcher 5 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Unspecified 3 5%
Other 5 8%
Unknown 30 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 10%
Engineering 4 7%
Unspecified 3 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 3%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 34 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 August 2021.
All research outputs
#15,685,238
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2,713
of 7,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#261,884
of 435,797 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#129
of 339 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,208 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,797 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 339 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.