↓ Skip to main content

Using a Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Method in Assessing the Causal Relationships Between Human Blood Metabolites and Heart Failure

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, September 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (61st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using a Two-Sample Mendelian Randomization Method in Assessing the Causal Relationships Between Human Blood Metabolites and Heart Failure
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, September 2021
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2021.695480
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zixian Wang, Shiyu Chen, Qian Zhu, Yonglin Wu, Guifeng Xu, Gongjie Guo, Weihua Lai, Jiyan Chen, Shilong Zhong

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 20%
Student > Master 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 60%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 20%
Unspecified 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2021.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,290
of 7,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,667
of 430,035 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#117
of 631 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,209 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,035 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 631 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.