↓ Skip to main content

A Mixed Comparisons of Aerobic Training With Different Volumes and Intensities of Physical Exercise in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, January 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
24 X users
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Mixed Comparisons of Aerobic Training With Different Volumes and Intensities of Physical Exercise in Patients With Hypertension: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, January 2022
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2021.770975
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhenghui Lu, Yang Song, Hairong Chen, Shudong Li, Ee-Chon Teo, Yaodong Gu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 3 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 19 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 6 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 6%
Social Sciences 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 18 55%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 June 2024.
All research outputs
#2,693,212
of 26,313,853 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#381
of 9,483 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,684
of 532,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#37
of 824 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,313,853 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,483 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 532,116 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 824 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.