You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Facts and Gaps in Exercise Influence on Arrhythmogenic Cardiomyopathy: New Insights From a Meta-Analysis Approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, February 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2021.816280 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Julia Martínez-Solé, María Sabater-Molina, Aitana Braza-Boïls, Juan J. Santos-Mateo, Pilar Molina, Luis Martínez-Dolz, Juan R. Gimeno, Esther Zorio |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2022.
All research outputs
#18,057,409
of 23,202,641 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2,904
of 7,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#345,518
of 507,827 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#339
of 860 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,202,641 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 507,827 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 860 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.