The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Corrigendum: Differential Risk of Dementia Between Patients With Atrial Flutter and Atrial Fibrillation: A National Cohort Study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, December 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2021.819771 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hui-Ting Wang, Yung-Lung Chen, Yu-Sheng Lin, Huang-Chung Chen, Shaur-Zheng Chong, Shukai Hsueh, Chang-Ming Chung, Mien-Cheng Chen |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 December 2021.
All research outputs
#6,408,689
of 22,769,322 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#996
of 6,664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#143,586
of 499,651 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#127
of 782 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,769,322 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,664 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,651 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 782 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.