The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Anatomic predictor of severe prosthesis malposition following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self- expandable Venus-A Valve among pure aortic regurgitation: A multicenter retrospective study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, December 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1002071 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yong Wang, Shiyong Yu, Dehui Qian, Jie Li, Zhenfei Fang, Wei Cheng, Xiaoqing Li, Ting Liu, Ying Zeng, Hongmei Xia, Jun Jin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#18,806,562
of 23,306,612 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,373
of 7,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#299,832
of 438,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#312
of 805 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,306,612 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,206 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 805 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.