The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Application of the ultrasound-guided double-screen contrast method in the standardized teaching and training of resident doctors in femoral vein puncture
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2022.1026619 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yunshui Zhang, Jin Li, Yaying Sun, Tao Liu, Wenmin Guo, Weiwei Ban, Yujie Ma |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2023.
All research outputs
#20,945,173
of 23,575,882 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,595
of 7,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#340,865
of 430,337 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#362
of 676 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,575,882 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,458 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,337 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 676 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.