The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Declining Levels and Bioavailability of IGF-I in Cardiovascular Aging Associate With QT Prolongation–Results From the 1946 British Birth Cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2022.863988 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christos Charalambous, James C. Moon, Jeff M. P. Holly, Nishi Chaturvedi, Alun D. Hughes, Gabriella Captur |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#7,555,549
of 23,312,088 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,242
of 7,212 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,239
of 441,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#189
of 977 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,312,088 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,212 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 977 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.