↓ Skip to main content

Comparison Between Treadmill and Bicycle Ergometer Exercises in Terms of Safety of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison Between Treadmill and Bicycle Ergometer Exercises in Terms of Safety of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Patients With Coronary Heart Disease
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2022.864637
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chuan Ren, Jingxian Zhu, Tao Shen, Yanxin Song, Liyuan Tao, Shunlin Xu, Wei Zhao, Wei Gao

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 44 75%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Librarian 1 2%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 2%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 7 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 44 75%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 5%
Sports and Recreations 2 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Social Sciences 1 2%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2022.
All research outputs
#17,696,782
of 22,721,584 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2,737
of 6,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,858
of 439,661 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#388
of 947 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,721,584 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,605 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,661 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 947 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.