↓ Skip to main content

Prevention of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity: The Good and Bad of Current and Alternative Therapies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, June 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevention of Anthracycline-Induced Cardiotoxicity: The Good and Bad of Current and Alternative Therapies
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, June 2022
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2022.907266
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nonhlakanipho F. Sangweni, Derick van Vuuren, Lawrence Mabasa, Kwazi Gabuza, Barbara Huisamen, Sharnay Naidoo, Reenen Barry, Rabia Johnson

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 9%
Unspecified 1 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 13 59%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 5%
Unspecified 1 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 14 64%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 June 2022.
All research outputs
#20,215,721
of 22,738,543 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,171
of 6,623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#352,303
of 439,956 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#578
of 936 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,738,543 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,623 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,956 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 936 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.