↓ Skip to main content

Gender Differences in Cardiogenic Shock Patients: Clinical Features, Risk Prediction, and Outcomes in a Hub Center

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gender Differences in Cardiogenic Shock Patients: Clinical Features, Risk Prediction, and Outcomes in a Hub Center
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, July 2022
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2022.912802
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sara Lozano-Jiménez, Reyes Iranzo-Valero, Javier Segovia-Cubero, Manuel Gómez-Bueno, Mercedes Rivas-Lasarte, Cristina Mitroi, Juan Manuel Escudier-Villa, Juan Francisco Oteo-Dominguez, Jose María Vieitez-Florez, Susana Villar-García, Francisco José Hernández-Pérez

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 18%
Other 2 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 53%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 35%
Physics and Astronomy 1 6%
Unknown 10 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2022.
All research outputs
#20,310,658
of 22,851,489 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,216
of 6,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#346,181
of 434,068 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#623
of 985 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,851,489 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,739 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,068 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 985 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.