The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of the Efficacy of ECMO With or Without IABP in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock: A Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, July 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2022.917610 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ping Zeng, Chaojun Yang, Jing Chen, Zhixing Fan, Wanyin Cai, Yifan Huang, Zujin Xiang, Jun Yang, Jing Zhang, Jian Yang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 18 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 17% |
Other | 2 | 11% |
Lecturer | 1 | 6% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Other | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 33% |
Engineering | 2 | 11% |
Psychology | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 January 2024.
All research outputs
#14,927,427
of 26,383,519 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,784
of 9,514 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,646
of 443,104 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#178
of 951 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,519 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,514 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,104 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 951 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.