↓ Skip to main content

Commentary: Cardiovascular risk according to body mass index in women of reproductive age with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Commentary: Cardiovascular risk according to body mass index in women of reproductive age with polycystic ovary syndrome: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fcvm.2022.920144
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yani Ke, Kaihan Wu, Shan Liu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 August 2022.
All research outputs
#20,514,440
of 23,081,466 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#4,356
of 6,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#342,700
of 432,814 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#614
of 991 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,081,466 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,995 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,814 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 991 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.