The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Short-coupled variant of torsade de pointes: A systematic review of case reports and case series
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2022.922525 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Guangqiang Wang, Lin Zhong, Hongxia Chu, Chunxiao Wang, Xuefeng Zhu |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2022.
All research outputs
#16,503,737
of 24,285,692 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#3,072
of 8,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,376
of 420,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#343
of 1,000 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,285,692 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,218 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,280 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,000 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.