The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Outcome of Patients Supported by Large Impella Systems After Re-implantation Due to Continued or Recurrent Need of Temporary Mechanical Circulatory Support
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, July 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2022.926389 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yukiharu Sugimura, Sebastian Bauer, Moritz Benjamin Immohr, Arash Mehdiani, Philipp Rellecke, Ralf Westenfeld, Hug Aubin, Udo Boeken, Artur Lichtenberg, Payam Akhyari |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Germany | 1 | 25% |
Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2022.
All research outputs
#14,073,803
of 24,261,860 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#1,663
of 8,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#175,544
of 424,897 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#188
of 950 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,261,860 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,193 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,897 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 950 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.