The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Experimental evidence of the genetic hypothesis on the etiology of bicuspid aortic valve aortopathy in the hamster model
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fcvm.2022.928362 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
María Teresa Soto-Navarrete, Bárbara Pozo-Vilumbrales, Miguel Ángel López-Unzu, Carmen Rueda-Martínez, M. Carmen Fernández, Ana Carmen Durán, Francisco Javier Pavón-Morón, Jorge Rodríguez-Capitán, Borja Fernández |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2022.
All research outputs
#18,036,345
of 23,172,045 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#2,896
of 7,084 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,165
of 433,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Cardiovascular Medicine
#365
of 981 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,172,045 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,084 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 433,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 981 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.